Legal Opinion

Allied Paper, Inc. v. H.M. Holdings, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1993No. 13374PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Presiding Judge.

Defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellant H.M. Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its third-party complaint against William H. Ames, C. William Simpson, and Richard Stewart and denying Holdings’ motion for either total or partial summary judgment. The trial court ruled that Holdings had no cause of action for fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty against Ames, Simpson, and Stewart because of language in the contract that purported to exculpate them from any liability with regard to breach…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  4. Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Corporate Circle, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Farnham v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Duckworth v. Burger King Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Export-Import Bank v. Advanced Polymer Sciences, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API