Jolman v. Alberts
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Case by Peter Jolman against Frank Alberts for personal injuries to plaintiff’s wife and damage to his buggy. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBkooke, J.
This case grows out of the same accident which gave rise to the case of Jolman v. Alberts, 186 Mich. 643 (158 N. W. 170). In the earlier case the wife recovered a judgment against the defendant. In the case at bar the husband brings suit to recover damages which he has suffered because of injuries to his wife in said accident. The elements of his damages are hospital charges, physician’s charges, loss of service, and cost of repairs to his buggy* which was injured in the collision.
The first five assignments of error are based upon alleged errors in the receipt or exclusion of testimony. We…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jolman v. AlbertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Jolman v. AlbertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kucken v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hatton v. StottMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Secrist v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Goldman v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Wilson v. MeldrumMichigan Supreme Court · 1934