Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1918No. Docket No. 43PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Brown, J., presiding. Case by Dora Goldman against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The plaintiff was a passenger on a Brush street car in the city of Detroit, operated by the defendant, on the 17th day of February, 1915. While proceeding north, the car was struck, at the intersection of St. Antoine street and Forest avenue, by a crosstown car going east and a portion of the car was knocked from the track. The plaintiff, who was sitting' in about the center of the car, saw that a collision was imminent, put up her hand to avoid screaming, and then says she does not remember anything after that until she found herself on the rear end of the car. There is no dispute as to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Purcell v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Nelson v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Hughes v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Eberts v. Mt. Clemens Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. People v. KimbroughMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. OsbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API