Legal Opinion

Secrist v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1941No. Docket No. 60, Calendar No. 41,555PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

On January 12,1937, at about 1:45 p. m., plaintiff Secrist was driving south on Fourteenth street in the city of Detroit. It is not clear whether Secrist was following a southbound streetcar and stopped behind it to make a turn or whether he overtook the streetcar and stopped on the right of the southbound rails to allow it to pass. Defendant claims that plaintiff attempted to make a U-turn approximately 100 feet north of Ash street, either as the southbound streetcar was entering or as it was leaving a safety zone at this corner. In any event, as plaintiff was making the turn a northbound…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Golob v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. King v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Lucy v. DowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Jolman v. AlbertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Greene v. RicherMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kucken v. Hygrade Food Products Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API