Legal Opinion

Jolman v. Alberts

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1916No. Docket No. 46PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Case by Sadie Jolman against Frank Alberts for personal injuries. Judgment for olaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The testimony introduced on the part of the plaintiff tended to prove that plaintiff’s husband had driven his horse to the curb on a paved *27street in the city of Muskegon; the buggy in which plaintiff was sitting being so close to the curb that she stepped into the buggy from the curb. Horse and buggy were headed south, and were on the west side of the street. It was about 9 o’clock in the evening, the nearest electric light was not burning, and the shade or shadow cast by nearby trees did not make discovery of the buggy on that account difficult. Defendant, going south on the street, ran his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harnau v. HaightMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Jolman v. AlbertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mobile City Lines, Inc. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. State v. RomoArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Gleason v. LoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Cole v. WilsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  5. Johnson v. GustafsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API