Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Muir
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Colins,
Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (petitioner) here appeals an order of the Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania (Commissioner) which affirmed a decision of the Insurance Department of Pennsylvania disapproving petitioners policy form filings deleting or modifying the uninsured motorist arbitration clause. The Commissioners order was based on his conclusion that the regulation found at 31 Pa. Code §63.2(a) required the arbitration clause which petitioner sought to delete or modify be a part of an automobile insurance policy providing uninsured…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Walker v. SauvinetSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Bankes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- White v. Concord Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Maloney v. VALLEY MEDICAL FACILITIES, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- INSURANCE FEDERATION OF PA v. Dept. of Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Lisanti v. Alamo Title Ins. of TexasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Johnson v. Pennsylvania National Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. KokenCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.