Legal Opinion

United States v. Pennsylvania Railroad

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 66-632PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSENBERG, District Judge.

This action was brought by the United States of America under the Hours of Service Act (45 U.S.C. §§ 61-64)1 against the defendant, The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce. The complaint as filed by the Government charges the defendant with violation of the Hours of Service Act by requiring and permitting the five employees on Extra 2230 East to remain on duty “for a longer period than sixteen consecutive hours.”

The parties hereto have filed an Agreed Statement of Facts. In this it is indicated that the defendant has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. United States v. Chicago, M. & P. S. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1912
  5. United States v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United Transportation Union v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Temple v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company v. Federico PenaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API