Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Pena

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 13, 1994No. Nos. 93-1505, 93-2378, and 93-2712PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERT, Chief District Judge.

The petitioners bring this petition for review of orders of the Federal Railroad Ad*326ministration (the “FRA”) changing its interpretation of the Hours of Service Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 61-64 (the “HSA” or the “Act”), to provide that time spent waiting by a train crew, which has been relieved from all train operating duties, for transportation back to its point of release is now “on duty” time to be counted toward the maximum 12 consecutive hours on duty allowed by the HSA. For the reasons given below, we grant the petition and affirm the agency’s decision.

As a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. United Transportation Union v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company v. Federico PenaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API