Legal Opinion

United States v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 26, 1962No. 20296PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNTON, District Judge.

The Court adopts the Supplemental Findings of Fact and Conclusions submitted by the plaintiff.

FINDINGS OF FACT

The United States of America, at the request of the Interstate Commerce Commission, brought this suit pursuant to the provisions of the Hours of Service Act, 45 U.S.Code 61 to 64, against the Detroit, Toledo and Ironton Railroad Company, hereinafter called the railroad, a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce by railroad.

This is a civil action for the recovery of the statutory penalty for one instance of an alleged violation of said Act. The case was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. United States v. Chicago, M. & P. S. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Janet B. Jopek, of the Estate of Donald N. Jopek, Deceased v. New York Central Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  2. United States v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. United States v. Pennsylvania RailroadDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API