Legal Opinion
Rugiero v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 19, 2004No. CRIM. 90-80941-01. No. CIV. 96-40376PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER (1) OVERRULING THE GOVERNMENT’S OBJECTIONS, (2) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND (3) GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Petitioner’s motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The thrust of Petitioner’s § 2255 motion is that, in violation of the Sixth Amendment, his former counsel, N.C. Deday LaRene, had a personal interest conflict that adversely affected LaR-ene’s representation of Petitioner: LaRene was the subject of a federal investigation during the pretrial and trial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CottleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- United States v. HaleNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- Chester v. Commissioner of Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Daly v. BurtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- Broady (Davis) v. Memphis Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.