Legal Opinion
Hutchinson v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1998No. 96-CV-87PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellant Ronald A. Hutchinson lost his job with the District of Columbia Fire Department after he allegedly failed to enter an emergency 911 call into the Department’s computer system. An administrative judge at the Office of Employee Appeals (“OEA”) determined that the Department acted properly in fining Hutchinson. Appellant filed a petition for review with the full OEAl, which was denied, and then filed a petition for review with the Superior Court, which also was denied. We affirm.
I
A. The 911 Call.
Hutchinson worked as a fire communications operator with the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Louis A. Carducci v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary, U.S. Treasury DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Short v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Teachey v. CarverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Johnson v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hogue v. HopperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Compton v. District of Columbia Board of PsychologyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.