Legal Opinion

Teachey v. Carver

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1999No. 98-SP-472, 98-SP-503, 98-SP-556PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

The principal question presented in these consolidated appeals is whether the District of Columbia Trustee for Offender Supervision 1 exceeded his legal authority by unilaterally promulgating a “directive” requiring the District of Columbia Board of Parole (“BOP” or “the Board”) to issue parole violator warrants in situations in which the Board’s regulations render that decision discretionary. The Trustee had reason to believe that prior to the issuance of Directive No. 001, prisoners whose parole should have been revoked had been allowed to remain on the streets and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Davis v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  3. Curtis E. Crawford v. Patricia A. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. Benn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Martin v. District of Columbia CourtsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API