Legal Opinion
Spartanburg County v. Pace
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 2, 1944No. 15629PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Associate Justice Oxner
delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court:
Spartanburg County seeks in this action to recover from Charles M. Pace, a former Probate Judge of said County, and the surety on his official bond, certain fees alleged to have been paid to Pace during his term of office by the South Carolina Tax Commission under Section 2489, Code of 1942. The Circuit Court sustained a demurrer interposed by defendants to the complaint, and from this order the County has appealed.
The respondent Pace was Probate Judge of Spartanburg County from January 3, 1939, to March 31, 1942.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Salley v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Truesdell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- State Ex Rel. South Carolina Tax Commission v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Senn v. Spartanburg CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- Anderson v. PageSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Dillon County v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Wilder v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Culbreth v. Prudence Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.