Legal Opinion

Wilder v. South Carolina State Highway Department

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 19, 1955No. 17098PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Associate Justice.

This controversy stems from a proviso in the General Appropriation Act of 1954 authorizing the State Highway Department “to add to each motor vehicle license fee an amount not to exceed 30 cents to cover postage charges.” 48 St. at L., page 1662. The case is here on an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that he owned two automobiles; that on October 29, 1954, he applied at the office of the Highway Patrol in the City of Sumter for license plates for the year commencing November 1, 1954 and tendered the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Valentine v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. State Ex Rel. Lyon v. State Dispensary CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whiteside v. Cherokee County School District No. OneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Capco of Summerville, Inc. v. J.H. Gayle Construction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Eagle Container Co. Ex Rel. Estate of Spotts v. County of NewberryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Spectre, LLC v. South Carolina Department of HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Edisto Fleets, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API