Triplett v. James
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
The bond prepared by defendant Western Surety (Western) was entered into with B & J for a specific purpose. G.S. 20-288(e) provides that,
Each applicant approved by the Division for license as a motor vehicle dealer . . . shall furnish a corporate surety bond ....
Any purchaser [emphasis added] of a motor vehicle who shall have suffered any loss or damage by any act of a motor vehicle dealer that constitutes a violation of this Article shall have the right to institute an action to recover against . . . the surety.
It is clear that the bond was purchased by B & J in order to comply…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dixie Container Corp. of North Carolina v. DaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . DavidsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ferris v. HaymoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Tomlinson v. Camel City Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Boone State Bank & Trust Co. v. Westfield Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Candid Camera Video World, Inc. v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- NCNB National Bank v. Western Surety Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.