Legal Opinion

Triplett v. James

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1980No. 7923SC561PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

The bond prepared by defendant Western Surety (Western) was entered into with B & J for a specific purpose. G.S. 20-288(e) provides that,

Each applicant approved by the Division for license as a motor vehicle dealer . . . shall furnish a corporate surety bond ....

Any purchaser [emphasis added] of a motor vehicle who shall have suffered any loss or damage by any act of a motor vehicle dealer that constitutes a violation of this Article shall have the right to institute an action to recover against . . . the surety.

It is clear that the bond was purchased by B & J in order to comply…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dixie Container Corp. of North Carolina v. DaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . DavidsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ferris v. HaymoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Tomlinson v. Camel City Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Boone State Bank & Trust Co. v. Westfield Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. Candid Camera Video World, Inc. v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. NCNB National Bank v. Western Surety Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API