Hood, Comr. of Banks v. . Davidson

BbogdeN, J.(1) Do Fidelity Bonds Nos. 1096651, dated 21 May, 1926, and 1267548, witb endorsement thereon, constitute one bond or contract of indemnity, or are they separate and independent contracts of indemnity ?(2) Was notice given by tbe plaintiff as required?(3) Was claim for loss given in accordance witb tbe terms of tbe contract ?

Tbe first bond, or No. 1096651, provided tbat “tbe right to make a claim hereunder shall cease at tbe end of fifteen months after tbe termination, expiration, or cancellation of this bond.” According to finding of fact No. 80 invalid loans made between 21 May,…