Legal Opinion

Candid Camera Video World, Inc. v. Mathews

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1985No. 8418SC1304PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Summary judgment should be granted when the movant establishes that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Ipock v. Gilmore, 73 N.C. App. 182, 326 S.E. 2d 271 (1985). Here the relevant lease provisions constitute all the material facts; therefore, the sole question is whether either party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Old Dominion Distributors v. Bissette, 56 N.C. App. 200, 287 S.E. 2d 409 (1982).

The issue of law before this Court concerns application to defendants of the exculpatory and indemnification…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Gibbs v. Carolina Power & Light CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Ipock v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. v. Hermon F. Fox & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Schenkel & Shultz, Inc. v. Hermon F. Fox & Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Hoisington v. ZT-Winston-Salem AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Atlantic Contracting & Material Co. v. AdcockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Childs v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API