Legal Opinion

Lashify, Inc. v. Qingdao Network Technology CoO., LTD. a/k/a Qingdao Follow the Trend Network Technology Co., LTD. a/k/a Qingdao Mars Culture Media Co., LTD d/b/a UCOOLME and Vivicute Limited

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 15, 2026No. 1:25-cv-04183Unknown

1Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: Sonnac nnnnns IK DATE FILED:_01/15/2026 LASHIFY, INC., : Plaintiff, : : 25-cv-4183 (LJL) -V- : : OPINION AND ORDER QINGDAO NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CoO., LTD. : a/k/a QINGDAO FOLLOW THE TREND : NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. a/k/a : QINGDAO MARS CULTURE MEDIA CO., LTD : d/b/a UCOOLME and VIVICUTE LIMITED, : Defendants. : nnn K LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Defendants Qingdao Network Technology Co., Ltd, a/k/a Qingdao Follow the Trend Network Technology Co., Ltd., a/k/a Qingdao…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  3. Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  4. Sequa Corp. v. GBJ Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. Mallinckrodt, Inc., Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API