Legal Opinion
Zlokower v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 17, 1986No. 12729PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSantaniello, J.
The dispositive issue on this appeal is whether a prospective tenant must show that he is qualified for certain housing as part of his prima *262facie case of discrimination under General Statutes § 46a-64 (a). On March 26, 1982, a hearing officer appointed by the state commission on human rights and opportunities (hereinafter the CHRO) found that the plaintiff, Sandra Zlokower, had denied the complainant, Conrad Pelletier, full and equal access to a public accommodation, in violation of General Statutes § 46a-64 (a).1 The plaintiff appealed the hearing officer’s decision to the Superior Court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bennett Robinson v. 12 Lofts Realty, Inc., and Paul HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- D. C. Williams Et Ux. v. The Matthews CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- William J. Phillips and Dorothy R. Phillips v. Hunter Trails Community AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Board of Trustees of Woodstock Academy v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Miko v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.