Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
In this housing discrimination action, the defendants, Michael Sullivan and Robert Sullivan, appeal 1 from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiffs, the commission on human rights and opportunities (commission) and Dennisse Colon, con- eluding that the defendants unlawfully had discriminated against Colon, a prospective tenant, on the basis of a lawful source of income in violation of General Statutes § 46a-64c. The defendants claim that: (1) this court should overrule its decision in Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan Associates, 250…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Conservation Com'n of Fairfield v. Red 11Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- State v. AshbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Valley Housing Lp v. City of DerbyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.