Legal Opinion
Miko v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 20, 1991No. 14192; 14193PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
This case involves a claim of housing discrimination brought by the defendant Nancy Marzan Melendez against the plaintiffs, William S. Miko, Joseph Miko and Edward D. Sullivan, as owners of Olive Garden Apartments, an apartment complex in Bridgeport. Melendez filed a complaint with the named defendant, the commission on human rights and opportunities (CHRO), alleging that she had been denied housing, in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1987) § 46a-64a,1 because she had a child. A hearing officer appointed *195by the CHRO upheld Melendez’ claim and awarded her damages. The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- A.R. Peter Lafond v. General Physics Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Safford v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.