Legal Opinion

Cabral v. Soares

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 2007No. A114703PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, Acting P. J.

Plaintiff Tammy Cabral appeals from an adverse judgment entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend a demurrer addressed to her original complaint. Plaintiff alleges that her former husband James E. Cabral is substantially delinquent in payments of spousal and child support. To prevent her from enforcing these obligations plaintiff alleges that James and his sister Mary L. Soares induced their mother to change her will to leave to Mary the one-third of her estate that she had previously designated to go to James, with the understanding that Mary…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Kurkjian v. OhannesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Kong v. CITY OF HAWAIIAN GARDENS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Reed v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Evans v. PayeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cabral v. MartinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Munn v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Amy's Kitchen v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. Charles Virzi Construction v. Studer CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API