Legal Opinion

Dunson v. South Portland Housing Authority

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 7, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] The employer, South Portland Housing Authority, appeals from a decision of a hearing officer of the Workers’ Compensation Board, granting the employee Marjorie N. Dunson’s petitions for award and awarding total incapacity benefits based on the relative contributions of three work-injuries. The hearing officer concluded that because the 1991 injury at Shaw’s Supermarkets contributed to only 25% of her total incapacity, Dunson is not entitled to an inflation adjustment, available only for total incapacity benefits, for the portion of her incapacity related to the 1991 injury. See 39…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kidder v. Coastal Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  2. Johnson v. SD Warren, Div. of Scott PaperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Ray v. Carland Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. McDonald v. Rumford School DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. Cust v. University of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leighton v. S.D. Warren Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Juliano v. AMERI-CANA TRANSPORTSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. Legassie v. Securitas, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Miller v. Spinnaker CoatingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. Trottier v. Thomas Messer BuildersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API