Legal Opinion
Students and Parents for Privacy v. Sch. Dirs. of Twp. High Sch. Dist. 211
District Court, E.D. Illinois
Decided March 29, 2019No. 16 C 4945PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JORGE L. ALONSO, United States District Judge
After defendants adopted a policy allowing transgender students to use the bathrooms *894and locker rooms of their choice, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint against defendants School Directors of Township High School District 211 ("District 211"). District 211 and intervenor-defendants move to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motions to dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
The following facts are from plaintiffs' complaint, and the Court takes them as true.1 Plaintiffs Students and Parents for Privacy…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carson v. New Bern Transport CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2024
- Doe No. 1 v.Bethel Local School District Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- Elagha v. Northwestern UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Mojsoski v. Indiana Wesleyan UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022
- Williams v. Chicago Public SchoolsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.