Legal Opinion

United States v. Luis Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 23, 1987No. 86-5029PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal concerns the district court’s obligation under Rule 32(c)(3)(D) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to make findings as to alleged factual inaccuracies in a defendant’s presentence investigation report. We must determine whether that obligation applies when the defendant’s allegation is not that there is factual inaccuracy but that inaccurate factual inferences are likely to be drawn from the report’s presentation of concededly accurate facts.

I

In May 1985, Luis Gomez was arrested at his home. The arresting officers found in Gomez’ apartment $55,000…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Walter MaysCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Katzin, Harry A/K/A "Porky"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Matthews, Michael J.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony M. Miele John Jay McElfresh Charles J. Walters Patrick T. Reinstadtler James F. Foster, Anthony M. MieleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Ervin Earl RutterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Robert Craig WexlerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Robert Tequan Nappi, A/K/A Quan Nappi, A/K/A Keith Wade, Robert Tequan NappiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. RosaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API