Legal Opinion
United States v. Katzin, Harry A/K/A "Porky"
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 7, 1987No. 86-1519PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
When a defendant disputes facts included in a Pre-Sentence Investigation report (PSI), Rule 32(c)(3)(D) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires a sentencing court to resolve those disputes or to determine that it will not rely on the disputed facts in sentencing. 1 The court must then append to the report a record of these findings or determinations before the Probation Office sends the report to the Bureau of Prisons or to the United States Parole Commission. 2
In this case, we must decide whether Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) grants a district…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ramesh Solomon v. Robert I. Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Herbert BaylinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Peter Arvanitis, Stanley Peters, John Yannakis, Perikles Panagiotaros, and Robert RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ignazio Antonino Mannino, A/K/A Nino (d.c. No. 89-Cr-00003-2) United States of America v. Emanuele Salvatore Mannino, A/K/A Sal (d.c. No. 89-Cr-00003-4) Ignazio Antonino Mannino and Emanuele Salvatore ManninoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Anthony J. Pivorotto, John Robert Woods. John Robert WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Ken GattasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.