Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony M. Miele John Jay McElfresh Charles J. Walters Patrick T. Reinstadtler James F. Foster, Anthony M. Miele
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 22, 1993No. 91-3855PublishedCited by 128 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal under the Sentencing Guidelines, the defendant Anthony Miele challenges the district court’s attribution of drug quantity, which was the basis under the Guidelines for determining the length of his sentence. In view of the numerous inconsistencies in the record, the fact that the source of most of the critical evidence was an addict-informant with an impaired memory, and the lack of any findings by the district court other than a single con-clusory finding as to drug quantity, we find that the record as it now stands does not meet the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Kikumura, YuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Carmine Fatico, and Daniel FaticoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. David Sklar, United States of America v. David SklarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John W. McDowell Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. GibbsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Yul Darnell Givan, United States of America v. Wayne TorrenceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.