Barth v. Crosson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs, present and former Judges of Family Court serving in Onondaga and Oneida Counties, sought judgment declaring that the disparity between their salaries and salaries paid to Family Court Judges in 12 other counties of the State pursuant to Judiciary Law § 221-e violates their right to equal protection of the laws under the State and Federal Constitutions (US Const, 14th Amend, § 1; NY Const, art I, § 11). In Barth v Crosson, Supreme Court, Onondaga County, granted judgment declaring that the statutory provisions that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Weissman v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Davis v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Edelstein v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Burke v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Buckley v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Burke v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Dickinson v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Benjamin v. Town of FentonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- Killeen v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.