Legal Opinion
Killeen v. Crosson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Boehm, J.
We are called upon to consider one more in a long series of cases necessitated by the failure of the Legislature to deal with judicial salary disparities since the Unified Court Budget Act (Judiciary Law § 39 [6] [L 1976, ch 966]) became effective on April 1, 1977 (see, e.g., Cass v State of New York, 58 NY2d 460, rearg denied 60 NY2d 586; Weissman v Evans, 56 NY2d 458; Buckley v Crosson, 202 AD2d 972; Burke v Crosson, 152 Mise 2d 158, affd 191 AD2d 997, revd 85 NY2d 10, on remand 213 AD2d 963; Barth v Crosson, 199 AD2d 1050; Edelstein v Crosson, 187 AD2d 694,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gramatan Home Investors Corp. v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- D'Arata v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Burke v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Weissman v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Samuels v. High Braes Refuge, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- D'Amico v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- State v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Reagan v. MilonasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999