Legal Opinion

Edelstein v. Crosson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 30, 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an *695action for a judgment declaring that "statutory provisions, effective from October 1, 1978, to the present date, establishing and perpetuating disparate salaries for the Judges of the County Courts of Dutchess, Orange, Rockland, and Westchester Counties to be unconstitutional as violative of the plaintiffs’ rights to the equal protection of the laws”, the appeals are from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Levitt, J.), entered August 10, 1990, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, granted the declaratory relief requested, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weissman v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Cass v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Davis v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Weissman v. BellacosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Kendall v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barth v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Burke v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Mackston v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Burke v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Vogt v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API