Legal Opinion
Buckley v. Crosson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 1994PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs, present and former County Court Judges serving in Oneida County, sought judgment declaring that the disparity in salary between plaintiffs and County Court Judges in 13 other counties of the State pursuant to Judiciary Law § 221-d violated their rights to equal protection of the laws under the Federal and State Constitutions (see, US Const, 14th Amend, § 1; NY Const, art I, § 11). Plaintiffs moved and defendants cross-moved for summary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Weissman v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sobel v. HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Davis v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Barth v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Burke v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- Burke v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Killeen v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- D'Amico v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Henry v. MilonasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Kaye v. LippmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.