MICHIGAN EX REL WAYNE CTY. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. Duck
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.
This action arises out of the Wayne County Prosecutor’s complaint to have defendants’ establishment declared a nuisance under MCL 600.3801; MSA 27A.3801 and the premises padlocked. Although the trial court found that some of the activities at the Dizzy Duck constituted a nuisance, it declined the prosecutor’s request to padlock the premises. Instead, the trial court enjoined those activities that it found to constitute a nuisance. The prosecutor now appeals and defendants cross appeal.1
"Dizzy Duck” is an assumed name registered by defendant Greenfield Eight Restaurant Company, Inc. Defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People Ex Rel. Wayne Prosecuting Attorney v. SillMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. HolschuhMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Gilchrist v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- MICHIGAN Ex Rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. BENNISMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Michigan Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. DuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. MellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- MICHIGAN EX REL WAYNE CTY. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. DuckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.