Legal Opinion

Michigan Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Duck

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1995No. Docket 98804, 98805PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

The Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney sought to have the defendants’ business establishment padlocked as a nuisance. Instead, the circuit court issued only an injunction against certain activities. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We vacate the judgments of the circuit court and the Court of Appeals and remand the case to the circuit court for reconsideration.

*355I

The Court of Appeals provided this account of the facts:

"Dizzy Duck” is an assumed name registered by defendant Greenfield Eight Restaurant Company, Inc. Defendant Boyce J. Maxwell is the incorporator, president, resident…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney v. LevenburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. Diversified Theatrical Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. LinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. City of Chicago v. GeraciAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. MICHIGAN Ex Rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. BENNISMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Van Buren Charter Township v. Garter Belt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Ludwig v. TOWNSHIP OF VAN BURENDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010
  4. People v. MellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Michigan Ex Rel. Wayne County Prosecutor v. DuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API