Legal Opinion

MICHIGAN Ex Rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. BENNIS

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1994No. 97339, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

In this case, we are required to construe various aspects of the nuisance abatement *722statute, MCL 600.3801; MSA 27A.3801.1 Specifically, we must decide whether an act of prostitution was consummated absent proof that money was exchanged. Next, we must determine whether the trial court erred in abating a vehicle used to commit an act of prostitution in a neighborhood with a reputation for illicit activity. Finally, we must consider whether a co-owner’s interest in a vehicle may be abated where the co-owner allegedly had no knowledge that the vehicle was used in proscription of the statute.

We…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. City of Grand Rapids v. CrockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. Brig Malek AdhelSupreme Court of the United States · 1844

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. People v. MoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. James Speet v. Bill SchuetteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. People v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. In re Forfeiture of a Quantity of MarijuanaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API