Legal Opinion
State Air Resources Board v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 15, 1979No. Civ. 20256PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDANIEL, J.—
Procedural Background
The action in the trial court by real party Air Quality Products, Inc., (Air Quality) sought money damages on an injurious reliance theory, and named as defendants, among others, the State of California and the State Air Resources Board (Board). The literal basis of the complaint in the language of Air Quality’s answer to the writ petition here under consideration is as follows:
“In order to satisfy a State-mandated air pollution cleanup, the Board enticed Air Quality into investing more than $2,000,000 in the development and production of an automobile…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Tresway Aero, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Busching v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Hampson v. Superior Court of Inyo Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Air Quality Products, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- House v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Brookview Condominium Owners' Ass'n v. Heltzer Enterprises-BrookviewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Wagner v. City of South PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Brookview Condominium v. Heltzer Enter.-BrookviewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.