Legal Opinion
Wagner v. City of South Pasadena
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 2000No. B128915PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NOTT, Acting P. J.
Appellants Richard Wagner, trustee of the Romaric Trust, and Robert Wagner, trustee of the Wagner Family Trust (appellants) appeal from a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of respondent City of South Pasadena (City) and real party in interest Landmark Theatre Corporation (Landmark). We affirm.
Contentions
Appellants contend that: (1) their petition for writ of administrative mandamus was timely served in accordance with the applicable statutes; or, alternatively (2) appellants substantially complied with the service requirements of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Gibble v. Car-Lene Research, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Rowe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Johanson Transportation Service v. Rich Pik'd Rite, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Walker v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Okasaki v. City of Elk GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc. v. City of IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- County of Sonoma v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Friends of Shingle Springs Interchange, Inc. v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.