Escrow Institute of Cal. v. Pierno
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FORD, P. J.
The plaintiffs have appealed from a declaratory judgment as to the constitutionality of the Escrow Law (Fin. Code, § 17000 et seq.) and the regulations issued pursuant thereto (10 Cal. Admin. Code, § § 1700-1753). The judgment, which was entered pursuant to the granting of the motion of the Commissioner of Corporations for judgment on the pleadings, 1 contains the following declaration: “That the Escrow Law of California and its regulations in their entirety are constitutional and that, in particular, the exemptions specified by section 17006 of the Financial Code are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Del Mar Canning Co. v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Post v. PratiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Royal Thrift & Loan Co. v. County Escrow, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004