Legal Opinion

Royal Thrift & Loan Co. v. County Escrow, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 2004No. B165006PublishedCited by 18 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CURRY, J.

In the underlying action, Arthur Paul Jones and Rosalie K. Jones filed a complaint against Michelle Kramer, County Escrow, Inc. (County Escrow), and Royal Thrift and Loan Company (Royal Thrift), among others, alleging negligence and fraud in connection with a loan secured by real property that they owned, and seeking quiet title. Royal Thrift cross-complained, seeking quiet title to the property, alleging, inter alia, negligence and fraud against Kramer and County Escrow, and requesting recovery on a bond issued by Star Insurance Company (Star Insurance) on behalf of Kramer…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Broberg v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Flores v. EMC Mortgage Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2014
  3. Demetriades v. Yelp, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Dias v. Nationwide Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  5. Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC v. 3 Arch Trustee Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API