Principal Life Insurance v. Peterson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARDAIZ, P. J.
Probate Code section 252 provides that when the named beneficiary of a life insurance policy “feloniously and intentionally kills” the person whose life is insured, the beneficiary “is not entitled to any benefit under the . . . policy . . . , and it becomes payable as though the killer had predeceased the decedent.” (Ibid.) Appellant is the named beneficiary of a $250,000 life insurance policy insuring the life of his late wife, Laci Peterson. On November 12, 2004, a jury found appellant guilty of the first degree murder of Laci Peterson, and on March 16, 2005, the San…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Holder v. AuguStar Life Assurance CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2025
- MacPherson-Pomeroy v. North American Company for Life and Health InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Munger v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023