Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fire Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 2010No. E046531Published

1Dissent

MILLER, J., Dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the trial court’s denial of Fire Insurance Exchange’s (Fire Insurance) motion for summary judgment.

DISCUSSION

A. Standard of Review

The independent standard of review is applied to the trial court’s order denying Fire Insurance Exchange’s (Fire Insurance) motion for summary judgment. (Baroco West, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co. (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 96, 99 [1 Cal.Rptr.3d 464] (Baroco) [Fourth Dist., Div. Two].) Specifically, the record is independently examined “ ‘in order to determine whether triable issues of fact exist to reinstate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Delgado v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Cross v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  5. Haynes v. American Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API