Legal Opinion
Maher v. Usbe Bldg. and Loan Assn
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided July 30, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The bill seeks the restraint of two certain actions at law and the matter is now before the court on the return of an order to show cause why a preliminary restraint should not be continued. The suit of the building and loan association is the result of the following situation:
On June 10th, 1926, the D D Realty Company and others executed a bond and mortgage to the association in the sum of $75,000. The mortgage became in default and foreclosure proceedings were instituted. The Ocean Pier Realty Company had at that time succeeded to the title to the mortgaged premises. That company, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Federal Title, C., Guaranty Co. v. LowensteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Better Plan B. L. Assn. v. HoldenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Usbe Bldg. v. Ocean Pier RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Bruen v. TeppermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
3Cited by8 opinions
- Meyer v. BlackerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Ritz Holding Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. ApplebyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Harvester B. L. Assn. v. KaufherrNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Silk-City B. L. Assn. v. Paterson Talmud TorahNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.