Bruen v. Tepperman
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The first cause of action set up in the bill seeks an injunction against the prosecution of a suit at law on an agreement by complainants to assume payment of a mortgage made by the defendant Tepperman. The mortgage in question is presently held by the defendant Lippman and Lowy, Incorporated; at least that is the inference to be drawn from the pleadings which are none too specific in this respect.
The mortgage covered premises in Nutley, New Jersey, which were conveyed to the complainants by Tepperman in exchange for a farm property in Maryland, and was subject to the lien of a first mortgage…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. StevensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Stulz-Sickles Co. v. Fredburn Constr. Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Howell v. BakerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Beacon Lamp Co. v. Travellers InsuranceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900
- Joseph W. North & Son, Inc. v. NorthNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Young v. WeberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Maher v. Usbe Bldg. and Loan AssnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Hillside National Bank v. SilvermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934