Isaacs v. De Hon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtMcCAMANT, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The complaint alleges a grubstake agreement of date February 14, 1920, under which plaintiffs were entitled to certain specified interests in any oil claims located by appellant in the Cold Bay oil field on the Alaskan peninsula. It is alleged that, while working under the grubstake agreement, appellant located an oil claim in the name of Mrs. Gordon; that Mrs. Gordon’s husband was a party to the grubstake agreement, and that Mrs. Gordon was well advised of its existence and of the rights of plaintiffs therein; that plaintiffs had demanded from her a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marquez v. FrisbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Taylor v. BenhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Osterman v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- China Press, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Java Cocoanut Oil Co. v. Pajaro Valley Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- No Oilport! v. CarterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1981
- Rock Island Oil and Refining Company v. SimmonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- United States v. ShingleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Recovery Oil Co. v. Van AckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Gibbons v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.