Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Shingle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1937No. 7975PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

The United States, hereinafter called appellant, brought this condemnation proceeding under and pursuant to the Act of April 14, 1930, c. 149, 46 Stat. 165, which provides:

“That the Secretary of the Navy is hereby authorized to examine and appraise the value of all privately owned rights of fishery in Pearl Harbor, island of Oahu, Territory of Hawaii, lying between extreme high-water mark and the sea and in and about the entrance channel to said harbor, within [a specified area], and . ... to make contracts for the purchase of same subject to future ratification and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Lehnen v. DicksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Land in Dry Bed of Rosamond Lake, Cal.District Court, S.D. California · 1956
  2. United States v. WaterhouseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  3. Akana v. DamonHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  4. New York Telephone Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  5. Lemke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API