Legal Opinion

Vuncannon v. Vuncannon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1986No. 8519DC960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Plaintiffs first assignment of error is deemed abandoned because “[questions raised by assignments of error in appeals from trial tribunals but not then presented and discussed in a party’s brief, are deemed abandoned.” N.C. R. App. Proc. 28(a).

The only questions properly before this Court are whether the trial court erred in finding that the 22 April 1985 Order was not based on perjured testimony procured by the defendant and in modifying the 22 April 1985 Order.

Plaintiffs contention is that because she alleged in her motion that defendant suborned the perjured testimony of his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sink v. EasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Oxford Plastics v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Daniels v. HatcherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Paschall v. PaschallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Hensley v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gibson v. MenaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Faucette v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API