Legal Opinion

Faucette v. Dickerson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1991No. 909DC1069PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying defendants’ motions for relief from judgment and motions to set aside entry of default and judgment by default pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rules 55 and 60 (1990). For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the order of the trial court.

Defendants argue that the trial court erred in denying defendant Robert Dickerson’s motion “to set aside entry of default and judgment by default and motion for relief from judgment.” Entry of default by the clerk is proper “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sink v. EasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Swenson v. ThibautCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Garrison v. GarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Oxford Plastics v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Bailey v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCrory & Williams, Inc. v. AllenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  2. Slattery v. Appy City, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2024
  3. Slattery v. Appycity, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API