Legal Opinion

Oxford Plastics v. Goodson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1985No. 849SC748PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendants bring forth two assignments of error in which they contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion for relief from the 18 January 1984 judgment by (1) finding that defendants had not shown excusable neglect and (2) finding that defendants had failed to produce evidence of a meritorious defense: For the reasons stated below we reverse the trial court’s order.

Relief from a judgment or order may be granted by the trial court “[o]n motion and upon such terms as are just” when there has been a(1) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;(6) Any other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Dishman v. DishmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Doxol Gas of Angier, Inc. v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. U.S.I.F. Wynnewood Corp. v. SoderquistCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Brewer v. ElksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hines v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Messer v. Laurel Hill AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Anuforo v. DennieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. East Carolina Oil Transport, Inc. v. Petroleum Fuel & Terminal Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Alston v. Federal Express Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API