Legal Opinion

Falk Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

On behalf of the plaintiffs it is urged that the evidence establishes without dispute* that the applicant was totally disabled prior to October 8, 1926, the date on which the commission found the applicant was permanently disabled and that such permanent disability accrued as early as July 1, 1926, and' that the present insurance carrier is therefore not liable. It may be conceded that the claimant was at least partially disabled as early as July 1, 1926. There is medical testimony which tends to .support the claim of plaintiffs. The date July 1, 1926, becomes significant because on that day…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Roess v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1974
  3. Wilson v. Van Buren CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Outboard Motor Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Kimlark Rug Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API