Legal Opinion
Roess v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided November 8, 1974No. 72-679-Civ-T-HPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HODGES, District Judge.
This is an action for breach of contract, jury trial demanded. Plaintiff Roess, as the insured, sues the Defendant under a contract of insurance claiming that he has suffered a loss within the purview of the policy and that the Defendant has breached its contract by refusing to pay. Defendant (St. Paul Fire) has consistently denied that the claim was within the coverage afforded by the policy.
A regularly scheduled pre-trial conference was conducted on May 21, 1974. Upon consideration of the pre-trial stipulation and the oral argument of counsel, it became apparent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Muller Fuel Oil Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Amer.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Life Insurance Company of Virginia v. ShiffletSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. HoxieSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Liabos v. HarmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- National Life Insurance Company v. HarriottDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Luisa M. Fernandez v. Bankers National Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Billings v. COMMERCE INSURANCE COMPANYMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- City Of Erie, Pennsylvania v. Guaranty National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- S. Freedman & Sons, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Harbor Insurance v. Central National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.