Legal Opinion

State v. Gerald

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1981No. 33PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial judge erred in failing to conduct a hearing to determine whether defendant wished to represent himself after defendant stated to the court that he did not want a lawyer.

This alleged error arose out of an incident that occurred during jury selection in which defendant spontaneously began to address the court. The trial judge immediately dismissed the prospective jurors from the courtroom and proceeded to inquire as to what was troubling defendant. The following exchange ensued.

DEFENDANT Gerald: Your Honor, sir,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. HickeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API